INCREASING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SOME TYPES OF ATTRACTANTS THROUGH SEVERAL TYPES OF DISPENSERS AGAINST FRUIT FLY PESTS (Bactrocera spp. ) ON GUAVA PLANTS (Psidium guajava L. )
Main Article Content
Sulaiman Ginting
S. Edy Sumantri
Fenty Maimunah Simbolon
Syamsafitri
This research was carried out in Sawit Rejo Village, Sunggal District, Deli Serdang Regency, North Sumatra Province, at an altitude of ± 500 m above sea level. The aim of this research was to determine the effectiveness and catchability of several types of attractants and dispenser media on the attraction of fruit fly pests to guava (Psidium guajava L) . This research was carried out in 2 stages. The first stage was a Randomized Block Design with testing of several types of attractants carried out at 9 levels, namely, A1 (Synthetic Methyl Eugenol Attractant 800 g/l), A2 (Pattoouli Oil), A3 (Nutmeg Oil), A4 (Pattoouli Flower Oil) , A5 (Cinnamon Oil), A6 (Ylang Ylang Flower Oil), A7 (Citronella Oil), A8 (Lemon Oil) and A9 (Vutive Root Oil). The second stage was a Factorial Randomized Block Design by testing several types of attractants and dispenser media, with the first factor being the type of attractant with 4 levels, namely A1 (Synthetic Methyl Eugenol Attractant 800 g/l), A2 (Pattoouli Oil), A3 (A1 + Solvent Solution) , A4 (A2 + Solvent Solution). The second factor for media dispensers was carried out at 3 levels, namely K (Cotton Roll Media), B (Wooden Block Media) and P (Plastic Media). The parameters observed were the number of fruit flies trapped in the bottle in the first stage, the number of non-target insects in the first stage, the number of fruit flies trapped in the second stage, the non-target insects in the second stage and. The results of the research showed that treatment in the first stage had a significant effect on the number of fruit flies trapped. Attractant treatment with synthetic methyl eugenol and patchouli oil is the treatment that attracts most fruit flies so they become trapped in the treatment bottles. Meanwhile, in the second stage, the research results showed that treatment A1 (Synthetic Methyl Eugenol Attractant 800 g/l) was the most effective in attracting fruit fly pests , this can be seen from the results of the number of fruit flies trapped in bottles compared to other types of attractants. Meanwhile, the most effective media dispenser is media K (Cotton Roll). This can also be seen from the number of flies trapped in bottles compared to other media. Meanwhile, the treatment interaction between the type of attractant and the dispenser media which had a significant effect was the interaction between A1 (Synthetic Methyl Eugenol Attractant 800 g/l) and the dispenser medium K (Cotton Roll), this can be seen from the results of the number of fruit flies trapped in the bottle compared to other interactions. This second stage of research shows the results of a real influence with a decreasing graph. This is in accordance with research conducted from treatment 1 DSA – 25 DSA, the number of fruit fly catching abilities decreased over time.
Agus N dan Najamuddin. 2008. Inventarisasi Keberadaan Hama dan Predatornya Pada Pertanaman Jeruk Besar (Citrus grandis L.) Di Kabupaten Pangkep Prosiding Seminar Ilmiah dan Pertemuan Tahunan PEI PFI XIX Komisariat Daerah Sulawesi Selatan : 160 – 161
Alexander B.H., Beroza. T.A., Oda, L.F. Steiner, D. H. Miyashita., and W.C., MitChell. 1962. The development of male melon fly attractants. J. Agric. and Food Chem. 10:270-276
Astriyani, W. S, 2014. Pengendalian Hama Lalat Buah Pada Tanaman Jambu Air. http://repository.unej.ac.id/bitstream/handle/123456789/73447/111510501003--Lutfi%20Handayani-1-30.pdf?sequence=1. Diakses 06 Februari 2018.
Badan Pusat Statistik. 2013. Produksi Buah-buahan dan Sayuran Tahunan di Indonesia. [Internet] [diunduh 2014 Des 27]. Tersedia pada:http://www.bps.go.id/tab_sub/view.php?kat=3&tabel=1&daftar=1&id_subyek=55%20¬ab=16. Diakses 04 Maret 2018.
BSN, Badan Standar Nasional. 2009. SNI 4491-2009 tentang jambu biji (Psidium guajava L). Jakarta: BSN.
Chua, H.T and Y. L. Chu. 1988. The male annihilation of oriental fruit fly on Lambay Island. Chinese j. Entomol. 8 (2) : 81 – 94
Departemen Pertanian (Deptan) 2007. Lalat Buah (Bactrocera dorsalis). http://ditlin.hortikultura.go.id/opt/jeruk/lalat/lalat.html. Diakses pada 04 Maret 2018.
Dhillon M.K, Singh.R., Naresh.JS., Sharma HC .2005. The Melon Fruit Fly Bactrocera cucurbitae: A Review of Biologi and Management. J.Insect Sci5: 1-16
Didah Faridah, 2011. Hama dan Penyakit Tanaman Jambu Biji (Psidium guajava L). di Kecamatan Rancabungur dan Kampus IPB Darmaga Bogor. Skripsi. IPB. Bogor
Direktorat Perlindungan Hortikultura. 2013. Statistik Produksi Hortikultura Tahun 2012. Direktorat Jenderal Tanaman Pangan dan Hortikultura. Direktorat Jenderal Bina Perlindungan Tanaman. Jakarta.
Direktorat Jenderal Hortikultura Kementerian Pertanian, 2015. Pengenalan dan Pengendalian Organisme Pengganggu Tanaman Hortikultura . Jakarta.
Djatmiadi dan Djatnika. 2001. Petunjuk Teknis Survei lans Lalat Buah. Pusat Teknik dan Metode Karantina Hewan dan Tumbuhan. Badan Karantina Pertanian. Jakarta
Drew, D. and Hancook. 1994 The Australian Handbook For The Identification Of Fruites Flies. Volume ke – 1, Australian : Canberra
Effendi, T.A., R., Rani, dan S. Samad. 2010. Pengujian beberapa jenis tanaman sebagai sumber atraktan lalat buah (Bactrocera spp.) (Diptera: Tephritidae) pada tanaman cabai (Capsicum annuum L.). Kongres Ilmu Pengetahuan Wilayah Indonesia Bagian Barat.
Epsky, N. D. R. R. Health, A. Guzman, and W. L. Meyer. 1995. Visual Cue and Chemichal Cue Interactions in a Dry Trap with Food Based Synthetic Attractant for Ceratitis capitata and Anastrepha ludens (Diptera: Tephtritidae). Environ. Entomol. 24:1387-1395. Dalam Hasyim dkk. 2010. Respon Hama Lalat Buah Jantan terhadap Beberapa Jenis Atraktan dan Warna Perangkap di Kebun Petani. Jakarta Selatan.
Fong, O. H. 2012. Extraction Of Essential Oil From Or-ange Peels. Thesis. Faculty of Chemical & Natural Resources Engineering, University Malaysia Pahang
Gusmailiana, Zulnely, Kusmiati E, Kulsum U. 2014. Minyak Atsiri Daun Kayu Manis (Cinnamomum burmannii) Serta Eksplorasi Potensi Pemanfaatannya. Badan Litbang Kehutanan. Bogor
Hayani, dan Eni. (2005). Teknik analisis mutu minyak nilam. Buletin Teknik Pertanian. 1(10),3.
Hidayati, N. (2003). Ekstraksi Eugenol dari Minyak Daun Cengkeh. Jurnal Teknik Gelegar. 14(2):49-54.
Habibi, 2012. Info Hama dan Penyakit Tumbuhan. Serial Online at http://info.hama.penyakit.tumbuhan.blogspot.com/2012/04/lalat-buah-bactrocera-sp.html. Diakses pada tanggal 04 Maret 2018
Indriyanti, H. 2012. Gejala Awal Akibat Serangan Lalat Buah Pada Tanaman Jambu. http://lib.unnes.ac.id/20181/1/4411409019.pdf. Diakses 06 Februari 2018. Diakses 04 Maret 2018.
Isnaini, Yanuarti. N. 2013. Identifikasi Spesies dan Kelimpahan Lalat Buah Bactrocera Spp di Kabupaten Demak. Skripsi Prodi. UNNES. Tidak Terbitkan.
Kardinan A. M Iskandar., S Rusli & Makmum. 2003. Tanaman Pengendali Lalat Buah. PT. Agromedia Pustaka, Jakarta.
Kardinan Agus 2007. Pengaruh Campuran Beberapa Jenis Minyak Nabati Terhadap Daya Tangkap Lalat Buah Pada Tanaman Jambu Madu. http://ballitro.ltbang.deptan.go.id/pdf/buletin/vol/xiiino2007/vol xviii no 01 2007 06.pdf. Diakses 04 Maret 2018.
Kardinan dan Syakir M. 2009. Potensi Bahan Alami Sebagai Pengendali Hama Lalat Buah (Bactrocera spp.) Jurnal Bahan Alami Indonesia 2:72 – 76.
Lawrence, B.M., 1990. Comperative chemical composition of various nutmeg oils. Perfumer & Flavorist. 15:66
Majalah Trubus, Edisi Juni 535. 2014. Tabulampot Jambu Madu Hasilkan Rp.38-Juta Sekali Panen. PT. Redaksi Trubus. Jakarta.
Meritt et al. 2003. Jambu Biji (Psidium Guajava). Trubus Agrisarana. Surabaya
Prawoto, Agus. 2004. Atraktan Nabati Untuk Mengendalikan Lalat Buah Pada PertanianOrganik.http://ballitro.ltbang.deptan.go.id/pdf/buletin/vol/xiiino2007/vol xviii no 01 2007 06.pdf. Diakses 23 Maret 2018.
Pujiastuti Y. 2007. Populasi dan Serangan Lalat Buah (Bactrocera Spp.) serta PotensiParasitoidiIyapadaPertanamanCabaiMerah(CapsicumAnnumL.) di Daerah Dataran SedangSumatera Selatan.Tanaman Tropika10(2): 17–28.
Sastrohamidjojo, 2002. Bunga Kenanga. http://task-list.blogspot/2008/04/data-percobaan-jumlah-bahan-rimpang.html. Diakses tanggal 13 Oktober 2014. Diakses 23 Maret 2018.
Siwi, S. S. P., Hidayat dan Suputa 2006. Taksonomi dan Bioekologi Lalat Buah Penting. Bactrocera spp. (Diptera: Tephritidae) di Indonesia. Balai Besar Penelitian dan Pengembangan Bioteknologi dan Sumberdaya Genetik Pertanian. Bogor.
Somaatdja, 2011. Pengembangan Peramalam Lalat Buah. Bactrocera spp. Di Tingkat Peramalan Organisme Penganggu Tumbuhan, Jatisari
Sosromarsono, S., J. Soejitno, M. Amir, S. Sastrosiswojo, dan Suhardi. 1988. Peranan pestisida dalam pengendalian hama dan penyakit tanaman pangan. Makalah Simposium Penggunaan Pestisida Secara Bijaksana. Himpunan Perlindungan Tumbuhan Indonesia, Jakarta. 51 hal.
Sunarno, W. 2011. Hama yang Penting Pada Tanaman Holtikultura. http://lib.unnes.ac.id/20181/1/44145657741409019.pdf. Diakses pada 06.Februari 2018
Susila, W., W. Supartha, dan Kt. Sumiartha. 2014. Uji efektivitas minyak atsiri buah pala sebagai atraktan dan insektisida nabati lalat buah (bactrocera dorsalis complex. Laporan Penelitian Unggulan Udayana. 31 hal.
Suputa, Cahyanti, Kustaryati A, Railan M, Issusilaningtyas & Taufiq A.2006. Pedoman Identifikasi LalatBuah (Diptera: Tephritidae).Yogyakarta: UGM.
Tarigan, A. 2012. Laporan Hasil Pelaksanaan Kegiatan Pertemuan Kordinasi Pengendalian Lalat Buah di Kabupaten Karo. Desa Dokan, Kabanjahe. download.portalgaruda.org. Diakses 06 Februari 2018
Utami, 2008. Jambu Biji Budidaya dan Ragam Pemanfaatannya. Penebar Swadaya, Jakarta.
Vijay Segaran S, Drew RAI. 2006. Fruit Fly Spesies of Indonesia: Host Rangeand Distribution .ICMPFF : Griffith University.
White IM & Harris EM. 1994. Fruit Fliesof Economic Significance: Their Identification and Bionomics.Wallingford, UK:CABInternational
Yoandestina, 2017. Metil Eugenol sebagai perangkap lalat buah. Balittra.litbang.pertanian.go.id/. Banjarbaru.
