RELATIONSHIP OF THE ETHMOIDAL INFUNDIBULUM, UNCINATE PROCESS, AND NASAL SEPTUM DEVIATION WITH CHRONIC MAXILLARY RHINOSINUSITIS ON PARANASAL SINUS CT SCAN IN MEDAN

Authors

  • Fingga Prahasti Nasution Universitas Sumatera Utara
  • M.Rizky Fachri Universitas Sumatera Utara
  • Elvita Rahmi Daulay Universitas Sumatera Utara
  • Ferryan Sofyan Universitas Sumatera Utara

Keywords:

ethmoidal infundibulum, uncinate process, nasal septal deviation, Keros classification, Gera classification

Abstract

Background: Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a common sinonasal inflammatory disease, with global prevalence ~10,9% (European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps 2021). CRS pathogenesis is associated with impaired osteomeatal complex (OMC) drainage, influenced by anatomical variations, e.g. ethmoidal infundibulum (EI) length and width, uncinate process (UP) type, and nasal septal deviation (NSD) degree. This study aims to evaluate the relationship between anatomical variations of the OMC (EI, UP, and NSD) and the occurrence of maxillary CRS based on paranasal sinus (PNS) CT.

Method: cross-sectional design involved 100 maxillary sinuses from patients who underwent PNS CT at Prof. Dr. Chairuddin Panusunan Lubis Hospital. Statistical analysis was performed using Chi-square and Eta correlation tests.

Result: Mean EI length in CRS (5.9 ± 2.7 mm) was shorter than in non-CRS (7.8 ± 2.6 mm, p<0.001), while EI width was greater (2.8 ± 1.1 mm vs. 2.3 ± 0.5 mm, p<0.05). UP type A was most frequent in CRS (47%, p<0.001). NSD ≥10° was more common in CRS (31%) than in non-CRS (13%, p<0.05).

Conclusion: Anatomical variations of OMC play an important role in predisposition to maxillary CRS. Most patients showed Keros type 2 and Gera type 2, indicating a moderate risk of complications during functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Comprehensive evaluation using PNS CT is essential for safe and effective surgical planning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Fokkens WJ, Lund VJ, Hopkins C, Hellings PW, Kern R, Reitsma S, et al. European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps 2020. Rhinology. 2020 Feb;58(Suppl S29):1–464.

2. Multazar M, Harahap A, Tamin S. Epidemiologi rinosinusitis kronik di RSUP H. Adam Malik Medan. Indones J Otorhinolaryngol. 2011;17(3):145–50.

3. Pletcher SD, Goldberg AN, Murr AH, Alt JA. Advances in the understanding of chronic rhinosinusitis: epidemiology, pathophysiology, and recent treatment innovations. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2016 Jun;49(3):607–25.

4. Lim M, Lew-Gor S, Darby YC, Stansbie JM. Imaging and anatomical correlation in chronic rhinosinusitis: a systematic review. Clin Otolaryngol. 2017;42(4):798–806.

5. Abdullah B, Singh K, Abdullah A, Raman R. Imaging of sinonasal anatomical variants in chronic rhinosinusitis: a computed tomographic analysis. Egypt J Otolaryngol. 2020;36(1):52.

6. Raza A, Rahim A, Khan M, Aslam A. Association of nasal septal deviation and anatomical variations with chronic rhinosinusitis: CT-based study. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2019 Apr;29(4):347–50.

7. Keros P. On the practical value of differences in the level of the lamina cribrosa of the ethmoid. Arch Otolaryngol. 1962;74:32–5.

8. Gera R, Mozzanica F, Preti A, Bandi F, Gallo S, Bulfamante AM, et al. A new classification of the lateral lamella of the cribriform plate (Gera classification). Clin Otolaryngol. 2010 Dec;35(6):461–7.

9. Yousefi Z, Dalili Kajan Z, Jalali MM, Khosravifard N, Rafiei E. Computed Tomographic Comparison of Length, Width and Angulation of Ethmoidal Infundibulum in Patients with and without Maxillary Sinusitis. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Oct;74(Suppl 2):1220-1231.

10. Erdem G, et al. Evaluation of Gera classification and its surgical implications in endoscopic sinus surgery. Clin Anat. 2019;32(4):560–566.

11. Stammberger H, Lund VJ. Anatomy of the paranasal sinuses. Rhinology and Skull Base Surgery. 2019.

12. Mafee MF, Chow JM, Meyers SP. Functional endoscopic sinus surgery: anatomy, CT screening, indications, and complications. Radiol Clin North Am. 1993;31(1):1–26.

13. Pynnonen MA, et al. Radiographic correlates of chronic rhinosinusitis severity. Laryngoscope. 2015;125(9):2016–2022.

14. Bolger WE, et al. The anatomy of the paranasal sinuses in chronic sinusitis. Am J Rhinol. 1991;5(2):85–90.

15. Lund VJ, Stammberger H. FESS: The Messerklinger technique. Thieme Medical Publishers; 2018.

16. Nouraei SA, et al. Variations in the paranasal sinus anatomy: impact on sinus disease. Clin Otolaryngol. 2019;44(3):375–382.

17. Al Abri R, Bhargava D, Al Balushi Z, et al. Anatomical variations of the ethmoid infundibulum in chronic rhinosinusitis: A CT analysis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020;277(6):1789–95.

18. Landsberg R, Friedman M. Variations of the uncinate process and their relationship to chronic rhinosinusitis: A CT study. Laryngoscope. 2017;127(5):1040–1046.

19. Elwany S, Medanni A, Eid M, Aly A. The depth of the olfactory fossa and the risk of cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea during endoscopic sinus surgery. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017;274(1):403–407.

20. Balikci HH, Gurdal MM, Ozkul MH, et al. Relationship between uncinate process variations and chronic rhinosinusitis: Radiological analysis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019;276(12):3439–3445.

21. Rajashree MS, Mahesh M, Shetty A. Radiological assessment of Keros and Gera classifications and their correlation in chronic rhinosinusitis patients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022;279(12):5675–5682.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-19

How to Cite

Fingga Prahasti Nasution, M.Rizky Fachri, Elvita Rahmi Daulay, & Ferryan Sofyan. (2026). RELATIONSHIP OF THE ETHMOIDAL INFUNDIBULUM, UNCINATE PROCESS, AND NASAL SEPTUM DEVIATION WITH CHRONIC MAXILLARY RHINOSINUSITIS ON PARANASAL SINUS CT SCAN IN MEDAN. MEDALION Journal: Medical Research, Nursing, Health and Midwife Participation, 7(2), 615–622. Retrieved from https://medalionjournal.com/index.php/go/article/view/342

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.